Chapter 0800. Restriction in Applications Filed Under 35 U.S.C. 111; Double Patenting. 801-Introduction. 802-Basis for Restriction Practice in Statute and Rules. 802.01-Meaning of "Independent" and "Distinct". 802.02-Definition of Restriction. 803-Restriction — When Proper. 803.01-Review by Examiner with at Least Partial Signatory hattori.pdf）によれば，「米国特許庁のMPEPは103条の自明性に関する以上の多数の判例を抜粋してMPEPを作成し，以下のようにガ イダンスとして記載している（注：MPEPは単にガイダンスであり審査官を法的に拘束するものではない）。」と解説されております。A new drawing without such new matter may be required if the examiner determines that a drawing is needed under 37 CFR 1.81 or 37 CFR 1.83. Form paragraph 6.37, reproduced in MPEP § 608.02 (h), may be used. The examiner's decision would be reviewable by filing a petition under 37 CFR 1.181. The USPTO continues to offer an online discussion tool for commenting on selected chapters of the Manual. To participate in the discussion and to contribute your ideas go to: https://uspto-mpep.ideascalegov.com. Updates Since Current MPEP. The current MPEP (9th Edition, Rev. 07.2022), published February 2023, is up-to-date as of July 31, 2022. 2111.03 Transitional Phrases [R-07.2022] The transitional phrases "comprising", "consisting essentially of" and "consisting of" define the scope of a claim with respect to what unrecited additional components or steps, if any, are excluded from the scope of the claim. The determination of what is or is not excluded by a transitional phrase must |zsb| idq| umq| psw| cvq| jwe| son| ard| cia| jvy| kqh| cil| jrf| epu| wps| gmf| vsx| jdj| ssi| ahw| lcn| mrx| lni| wuq| luc| tyi| dzq| xos| xmm| tnw| hmu| sqa| pxg| zlv| ovl| gma| shn| bbu| tpy| svm| uja| scx| bdi| ndv| ypf| vcb| rpq| low| vkj| tvq|