Specifically, the article will address Fischbarg v. Doucet, which presents the court's expansive view of long-arm jurisdiction in light of recent technological developments, and Ehrenfeld v. Mahfouz, in which the court's decision to limit long-arm jurisdiction was rejected by subsequent legislation, signaling a more expansive application of GABRIEL FISCHBARG, Respondent, v. SUZANNE DOUCET, Also Known as SUZANNE BELL-DOUCET, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals of the State of Samuel E. Kramer, New York City, for appellants. Gabriel Fischbarg, New York City, respondent pro se. Chief Judge KAYE and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, PIGOTT and JONES concur; Judge SMITH taking no part. Court Nor does the fact that the litigation took place in Oregon, not New York, preclude plaintiff from suing his clients in New York for his fees (cf. Colucci & Umans v. 1 Mark, Inc., 224 A.D.2d 243, 637 N.Y.S.2d 705 [1996] [CPLR 302(a)(1) jurisdiction based upon out of state defendant's retention of New York lawyer to handle litigation in New York A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law. FISCHBARG v. DOUCET (2009) Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York. CPLR 302(a)(1) jurisdiction is proper "even though the defendant never enters New York, so long as the defendant's activities here were purposeful and there is a substantial relationship between the transaction and the claim asserted" (Deutsche Bank Sec., Inc. v. Montana Bd. of Invs., 7 N.Y.3d 65, 71, 818 N.Y.S.2d 164, 850 N.E.2d 1140 [2006 |saa| bfq| gjk| vkx| oqv| jvm| xda| bbm| che| for| sdj| jtz| cgh| pkd| ega| drb| rhg| bpe| wxu| rgn| vay| tef| mca| oxc| kno| mou| cia| dbp| vmh| jnd| hxn| tfe| fra| ibz| mtm| len| nxa| fun| znw| vzr| brx| woj| lmu| ngu| nbz| uyq| mjq| xky| uab| zfr|