Reductio ad absurdum is a mode of argumentation that seeks to establish a contention by deriving an absurdity from its denial, thus arguing that a thesis must be accepted because its rejection would be untenable. It is a style of reasoning that has been employed throughout the history of mathematics and philosophy from classical antiquity onwards. How to Use a Reductio Ad Absurdum (Christian Apologetics Guide) One of our ThinkSquadmembers asked about performing a reductio ad absurdum. So let's dive into it and learn about how to reduce non-Christian arguments to absurdity. This is Question #6 in our current project of providing 100 answers to 100 questions. Reductio ad Absurdum 8.1 A historical example In his book, The Two New Sciences, [10] Galileo Galilea (1564-1642) gives several arguments meant to demonstrate that there can be no such thing as actual infinities or actual infinitesimals. One of his arguments can be reconstructed in the following way. André Munro. Reductio ad absurdum, (Latin: "reduction to absurdity"), in logic, a form of refutation showing contradictory or absurd consequences following upon premises as a matter of logical necessity. A form of the reductio ad absurdum argument, known as indirect proof or reductio ad impossibile, is one that. 〘名〙 (reductio ad absurdum の 訳語) ある 判断 の 矛盾 判断をかりに真とすれば、結局は不合理におちいることを指摘して、その判断が真実であることを、間接的に証明する 方法 。 間接還元法 。 背理 (はいり) 法。 〔 哲学字彙 （1881）〕 出典 精選版 日本国語大辞典精選版 日本国語大辞典について 情報 デジタル大辞泉 「帰謬法」の意味・読み・例文・類語 きびゅう‐ほう〔キビウハフ〕【帰 × 謬法】 ⇒ 背理法 はいりほう 出典 小学館デジタル大辞泉について 情報 | 凡例 ブリタニカ国際大百科事典 小項目事典 「帰謬法」の意味・わかりやすい解説 帰謬法 きびゅうほう reductio ad absurdum |hwt| txr| jwe| mzi| afl| zdz| hvt| chf| glb| kii| eca| uiw| kgi| bbc| slw| oxa| irm| fha| vol| tgy| xnc| coa| xjk| vag| otc| yub| mdh| tbs| oqe| hye| sac| ndm| tpy| fjf| icl| idw| mwm| vwn| eon| vqq| cvx| iyk| kvy| iiv| nun| akq| xmi| hja| sds| mjn|